Is this to be a "my network operators are bigger than yours" exchange?
I believe those in support of this proposal are actually obligated to
respond if they wish the draft to move forward. If those in support of
this proposal never speak up with the details of their support, how is
this a working group at all?
Ben
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 11:33:43PM -0400, Jim Bound wrote:
> We don't have to answer to you or anyone else. Obviously people don't
> care about your issue as I see no support for your proposed wall against
> the aggregation draft. I think its in the decision of the chairs now.
> As far as no network operators care I called two ISP network operators
> today and both will pilot jessica's proposal simply to see if
> implementors can make it work. They like I feel no duty to respond to
> "you". Got it!!!!
>
> regards,
> /jim
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
