Re: W.G. Last Call on "IPv6 Multihoming with Route Aggregation"

[Jim Bound]

>> We don't have to answer to you or anyone else.  Obviously people don't
>> care about your issue as I see no support for your proposed wall against
>> the aggregation draft.  I think its in the decision of the chairs now.
>
>Incorrect. There has bave been questions about the proposed value of this
>I-D.

No it is correct.  True the "Chairs" and authors have to respond and 
I should have made that distinction, I or other WG members do NOT HAVE to 
respond to you or anyone else.  Again Got It!!!!

regards,
/jim 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------