>> >* Please add "POSIX Consideration"
>> > Glibc people says declarations for some functions (like
>> > inet_{pton,ntop}() or getnameinf()) in RFC2553 are conflicted
>> > with ones in POSIX.
>>
>> This we need to check. But realize POSIX will use this spec with XNET
>> approval. They are out of wack now but are in the process of synching
>> up.
>Current XNS spec is strange.
I think I have emailed on this more than twice, for me it seems that
glibc people misunderstood what is meant by "socklen_t". I *strongly*
object to make this unnecessary change (size_t -> socklen_t for
hostnamelen/servnamelen/etc).
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
