>> As there is no change between RFC2553 and 2553bis on this particular
>> "getnameinfo argument" issue, RFC2553 is the correct specification
>> to look at for this particular issue.
>> Please try to convince glibc guys, quoting the above if necessary.
> I've raised an official bug-report:
> <http://www-gnats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl/full?pr=1805>
> We need comments on this from people other than me to convince them.
> Please, please comment on this directly (not via me) to the
> glibc people. We really need it.
Here's how to append comment onto the above bug report:
send email with the following headers.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libc/1805
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
