>>> As there is no change between RFC2553 and 2553bis on this particular
>>> "getnameinfo argument" issue, RFC2553 is the correct specification
>>> to look at for this particular issue.
>>> Please try to convince glibc guys, quoting the above if necessary.
>> I've raised an official bug-report:
>> <http://www-gnats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl/full?pr=1805>
>> We need comments on this from people other than me to convince them.
>> Please, please comment on this directly (not via me) to the
>> glibc people. We really need it.
> Here's how to append comment onto the above bug report:
> send email with the following headers.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: libc/1805
There will be some delay until the bug report gets updated, so
DON'T RESEND even if you don't see your email pasted onto the bug
report.
itojjun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
