> Can you explain why people think there is any need to allocate anything > longer than a /48 in the first place? i believe the document restricted it to single-device network allocations. is a /64 too small for a single device? randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Document Revision 山本和彦
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Doc... Stephen Burley
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Po... Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Po... Francis Dupont
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv... Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv... Tim Chown
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce... Steve Deering
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-anno... Brad Huntting
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Ignatios Souvatzis
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Ignatios Souvatzis
