In your previous mail you wrote:
Can you explain why people think there is any need to allocate anything
longer than a /48 in the first place?
=> many ISPs want to allocate /64 (or worse) to their customers... and
shout a /48 per customer is far too large. I believe this is a consequence
of the slow^N start, ie. the /35 rule (RIRs trim address space of ISPs,
ISPs take back the burden to their customers).
The idea is to introduce a small site (/56) for "poor & little" customers
and to make it the *default* allocation. IMHO this is an acceptable target.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
