> => many ISPs want to allocate /64 (or worse) to their customers... and > shout a /48 per customer is far too large. I believe this is a consequence > of the slow^N start, ie. the /35 rule (RIRs trim address space of ISPs, > ISPs take back the burden to their customers). someone who gets it! the /35 game sucks. randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Document Revision 山本和彦
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy Doc... Stephen Burley
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Policy... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Po... Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv6 Po... Francis Dupont
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv... Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce] IPv... Tim Chown
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-announce... Steve Deering
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-anno... Brad Huntting
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Ignatios Souvatzis
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Ignatios Souvatzis
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Matt Crawford
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Ronald . vanderPol
- Re: (ngtrans) Fw: [apnic-... Matt Crawford
