>>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:43:32 +0100 (CET),
>>>>> Yves Legrandgerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I agree, we need two things:
> 1) a new option for getsockopt() to get the actual path MTU (there is no
> standard way to do that).
Applications can dynamically grab the path MTU by the IPV6_RECVPATHMTU
socket option (upon receiving an ICMPv6 packet toobig error).
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Francis Dupont
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Francis Dupont
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
