In your previous mail you wrote: > Then why not just look up the routing table and get the MTU of the > outgoing interface? I admit that a single operation to do that would > be convenient, but I personally don't think we have to add a separate > socket option for this particular purpose. => I agree, it should be a library function (still in advanced API but not as a getsockopt()). [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: on some systems getsockopt() is not supposed to have an argument (ie. optval points only to a buffer for the result) then be careful. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Francis Dupont
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Francis Dupont
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Yves Legrandgerard
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Erik Nordmark
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Francis Dupont
- RE: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Dave Thaler
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: IPV6_USEMTU socket option Francis Dupont
