[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> suppose you have heard RAs from multiple interfaces. there's no
> guidelines for us to pick which interface from them, for the
> installation of default route. and things like that.
> RFC2461 appendix A talks about a host with multiple interfaces,
> however, the description is not really complete. so i personally
> feel multi-interface autoconfigured host needs more work in
> specification side. of course, we can have some configuration
> variable in implementation and prefer one of the outgoing interface,
> but... i'm not sure.
Isn't BSD's single routing table (common for all interfaces) conflicting
with the conceptual model of ND with more or less independent interfaces
with no routing table for a host implementation but more simple things
such as neighbor cache, destination cache, default router list etc. for
each interface?
Should a host allow internal forwarding of packets between interfaces? A
strict routing model maybe doesn't have this problem?
/Mattias
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
