> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Mixed Host/Router behaviour
>
> > | also, since RFC2462 basically assumes single-interface host,
> >Huh?
> >I just re-read the thing, and I can't find any assumption like that
at
> >all.
>
> suppose you have heard RAs from multiple interfaces. there's no
> guidelines for us to pick which interface from them, for the
> installation of default route. and things like that.
> RFC2461 appendix A talks about a host with multiple interfaces,
> however, the description is not really complete. so i
personally
> feel multi-interface autoconfigured host needs more work in
> specification side. of course, we can have some configuration
> variable in implementation and prefer one of the outgoing
interface,
> but... i'm not sure.
Try draft-draves-ipngwg-router-selection-01.txt.
Our implementation does implement IsRouter on a per-interface basis.
-Dave
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
