>This is a IPng working group last call for comments on advancing the
>following document as a Proposed Standard:
> Title : Default Address Selection for IPv6
> Author(s) : R. Draves
> Filename : draft-ietf-ipngwg-default-addr-select-04.txt
> Pages : 20
> Date : 14-May-01
>Please send substantive comments to the ipng mailing list, and minor
>editorial comments to the author. This last call period will end two
>week from today on June 7, 2001.
were there concrete agreement made about standard-track/informational?
i find the following on IETF50 minutes, nothing else (correct me
if i'm wrong). were there any poll on mailing list made?
http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/minutes/ipng-minutes-mar2001.txt
itojun
---
Jim Bound thinks this shouldn't be a standard, should be informational.
Thinks is policy. This should be suggested recommendation, not default.
Draves: Thinks this document does have implementation requirements.
"Must" requirement have implementation consequences. Bound: Doesn't
agree with some of the choices (e.g., selection of site scope as source
to send to global destination).
(snip)
Nordmark: Thinks this should be standards track. Splitting between must
and should.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
