Thanks for the information Yuji.
One interesting thing to me about routing header specified in rfc 2460, is
that the spec descrbies that the routing header itself, rather than routing
header with type 0 is similar
to loose source route option in IPv4. What is missing (I think) in the spec
is, description on possiblities of plural routing headers with different
types or the same types.
PS, Please, would anyone notify me of the reliable delivery of this message
? It seems the majordomo does not like this email very much - it spat out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "IMAI Yuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Q] Routing header
> Hi, Jiwoong.
>
> You can find IANA already assigned one more type of routing
> header looking at
> http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/ipv6-parameters
>
> I am not sure but there was no consderation we can attach more
> than two routing header in a datagram.
> ---
> Yuji
>
> From: "Jiwoong Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Q] Routing header
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 09:25:02 +0900
>
> > I found only one type of routing header is given in the IPv6 spec.
> >
> > I've got two simple questions:
> >
> > 1) Are there other kinds of routing header type defined in documents ?
> > 2) If any, Is it possible to include multiple routing headers at the
same
> > time with different routing header type ?
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
