Re: W.G. Last Call on "Default Address Selection for IPv6"

[JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉]

>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2001 15:58:17 +0700, 
>>>>> Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>   | Here are some inconsistency comparing to the latest versions of the
>   | scoping/address architecture drafts:

> Here I think it is better to use the values from the currently published
> RFCs - the actual numbers aren't important to anything in this draft,
> and using data from a doc that isn't yet an RFC will only serve to hold
> up this one until that is eventually published.

Okay, I don't mind the policy.  But then, the addr-select draft should
refer to RFC 2373, instead of the scoping architecture draft:

   Multicast destination addresses have a 4-bit scope field that 
   controls the propagation of the multicast packet. The IPv6 
   addressing architecture defines scope field values for node-local 
   (0x1), link-local (0x2), site-local (0x5), organization-local (0x8), 
   and global (0xE) scopes [9]. 
                           ^^^ this should be RFC 2373.

                                        JINMEI, Tatuya
                                        Communication Platform Lab.
                                        Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------