Re: Wrap up and last call: sin6_scope_id semantics

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   > => I prefer real names than xxxNNN. Can we get both (i.e. a config file
   > plus a default translation rule)?
   
   I do not object to introducing real names, but I'd like to leave that
   part as implementation dependent, and just define the formal aliases
   (like "link2") in the scope architecture draft.
   
=> I don't understand your problem there: I prefer fe80::xxxx%eth0 to
fe80::xxxx%link12, I believe you too...

Regards

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------