Re: Wrap up and last call: sin6_scope_id semantics

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   Well, as a developer and a user of the KAME IPv6 stack, I prefer
   fe80::xxxx%eth0 to fe80::xxxs%link12.  The implementation (at least
   currently) assumes one-to-one mapping between interfaces and links,
   which is natural in a normal operation, and thus eth0 should be more
   intuitive than link12.
   
=> I just want aliases, not only a standard name (i.e. my concern
is about one-to-one mapping between zone IDs and names).

Regards

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------