Re: Wrap up and last call: sin6_scope_id semantics

[Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino]

>I also prefer eth0 over link12.  Using the names used to define the zones
>(either the default interface names or actual zone definitions) seems to be
>more useful than generating a somewhat arbitrary name and displaying that.
>How is the user supposed to correlate link12 back to the actual eth0
>interface, anyway?  I imagine another external or display could be used,
>but this would seem to introduce yet another step for a user to identify
>the particular interface/zone in question.

        I guess textual representation is outside of the scope of the
        discussion.  it is the matter of getaddrinfo/getnameinfo behavior,
        and it is outside of the scope of sin6_scope_id semantics discussion.

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------