To avoid repeating pretty much what was already said, please see Thomas Eklund messages. Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > > >As I think that no standard should be excluded, I think that IPv6 WG > >should do its best, to make IPv6 work well, friendly with MPLS. Which is > >in a way [a subset of a)]+c). > > could you describe "[a subset of a] + c" in more detail so that > people can understand you better? > > itojun
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature- a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Jim Bound
- RE: a), b), c), d), or e) jarno . rajahalme
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Bob Hinden
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- RE: a), b), c), d), or e) Christian Huitema
- RE: a), b), c), d), or e) Tony Hain
- RE: a), b), c), d), or e) Rami Lehtonen
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- RE: a), b), c), d), or e) jarno . rajahalme
- RE: a), b), c), d), or e) jarno . rajahalme
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
