I've never been able to think of a theoretical reason why the two endpoints of a point-to-point link have to have addresses which are related in any way. Is there some more practical reason why they should be? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Har... Pekka Savola
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Robert Elz
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Charles E. Perkins
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Pekka Savola
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Pekka Savola
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Robert Elz
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Michael Thomas
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Charles E. Perkins
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Robert Elz
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered... Robert Elz
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Matt Crawford
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Pekka Savola
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful J�r�me Durand
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Har... Randy Bush
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Har... Antonio Querubin
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Robert Elz
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Antonio Querubin
- RE: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Christian Huitema
- RE: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Pekka Savola
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Robert Elz
- Re: /127 for P-t-P Considered Harmful Matt Crawford
