> I think it is necessary to have interconnexion networks using public > addresses for debugging routes (ex: traceroute or things like that) so we > need to number those networks. > a /127 wouldn't be a good idea. It's difficult for a provider to play with > prefixes that do not fit with the beginning or the end of a quartil. It's > not very simple to deal with the /35 given to providers as well ! > So I think that a /64 is a good idea for interconnexion networks.
since it is a subnet, should it not get a /48. maybe, just to be safe, a /44? after all, 128 bits is infinite, right? randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
