On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Francis Dupont wrote: > => I agree (this argument applies near each time where the bandwidth > is critical) but I believe the purpose is not to save bandwidth but > to replace special devices by a more general one: > - replace one shot source routing by IPV6_NO_SRC > - replace home address option by IPV6_NO_DEST > There are already degenerated (i.e. optimizable) cases of tunnel in > mobility, IPsec, ... To have a general mechanism is a good idea, > at least as a basis for discussion.
Exactly the point I was making. Saving bandwidth won't hurt, but that's definitely not the reason to do it. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
