In those cases Shipworm is the mechansim of choice. In any case we need to be forcing the system to provide uninhibited IPv6 service to the applications. If ISPs try to prevent that it will cost them effort, and eventually customers.
Tony > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:05 AM > To: Tony Hain > Cc: Michel Py; Keith Moore; Robert Elz; Brian E Carpenter; JJ Behrens; > Irina Dayal; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IPv6 Addr/Prefix clarification > > > > > 1. Telling ISPs that they should give customers that want > to subnet > > > a /48. (or tell customers that want to subnet that, if they don't > > > get a /48 from their ISP, they'd better shop somewhere else) > > > > We should also not forget to point out that they already have one or > > more /48's from the uncooperative ISP, simply by using 6to4. > > presuming, of course, that IPv4 service with a stable address > is available > at that time, and that the ISP doesn't filter 6to4 packets. > > Keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
