Kre and Philip,

> I find it almost impossible to work out where /80 comes from (unless
> you mean to find a need to do so, in which case, then yes, I'd find
> that pretty difficult too, though I prefer more often to have
> constant 0 bits in higher order positions than lower ones, so I'd
> tend to make the mask longer, and put 0's in the subnet section
> rather than shorter with 0's in the host part - but that's just
> aesthetics). But if there's something supposedly magic about the last
> 48 bits (48 now is 100% irrelevant to autoconf, so it cannot be
> that) it has escaped me.

What I had in mind was that if someone felt like re-inventing the wheel
and create a new autoconf, it would be extremely difficult not to use
the 48-bit MAC address (nobody would buy having ARP for IPv6), therefore
going beyong /80 would be very difficult.


> For giving advice to the population at large, I'd probably suggest
using
> /64 for almost all nets, to lower the chances of running into limits
in
> the technology that shouldn't be there (but bugs exist everywhere).

Concur.

> Philip Homburg wrote:
> What happens if an organization has a modem bank for dail-in? Do you
> hand out /64s or something larger? Suppose that you want to give each
> 'modem user' a fixed prefix, how soon do you run out of prefixes?

Modem users will be more than happy with a /64, because they do not need
to
subnet. If one wants to share the modem connection for their home
network,
that home network is a single subnet and will do fine with a /64.
Broadband
home connections (cable/dsl) would do ok with a /64, too, for the same
reason.

Why would someone want a /68 (or whatever) for the living room, a /68
for
the john, a /68 for the kitchen, a /68 for the garage?

Michel.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to