>>> Keith Moore wrote: >>> By allowing sites to subnet /64s we aren't forcing them to give up >>> autoconfig, private addresses, etc...
>> Michel Py wrote: >> Would you educate me on how you do autoconfig, let's say, on a /85 ? > Keith Moore wrote: > you don't. a site that chooses to subnet below /64 is inherently > choosing not to use stateless autoconfig. but this is a choice for > that site to make, not for us to make on that site's behalf. This is direct contradiction with what you wrote before. > you still haven't given a single argument in favor of not allowing > sites to subnet below /64. Yes, I have. And you haven't yet given a single good reason why a site should subnet below /64, when a site should, indeed, use the SLA bits (means SITE LEVEL AGGREGATOR) which have been designed for that very purpose. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
