Before folks go and do a lot of additional work to update
draft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00.txt based on our discussions,
I think we have to answer a fundamental question:
Should the WG publish an informational RFC detailing the IPv6
requirements for cellular hosts?
If so, how can we prevent the two most likely bad outcomes:
- 3GPP (or other) folks thinking that this document
is an IETF standard? [May be handled by
a strongly worded disclaimer in the document?]
- Everyone with an agenda attempting to publish a
similar document for their "special"
category of IPv6 host? [Can we just say 'no'?]
I also think that we should start work on two standards-track
documents, both of which would use the current draft as
input:
- An "IPv6 over <foo>" document for 3GPP links.
- A general "IPv6 Node Requirements" document.
Margaret
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
