Erik Nordmark wrote: >>If there are decisions as to what to do with ND/DAD/whatever, >>should those be made by (a) IPv6 WG, (b) 3GPP, or (c) >>vendors? >> > > Jari, > > I think the ND/DAD type issues can be dealt with by the IPv6 over foo > document which should be a lot quicker to produce than the host requirements > document.
True, but I guess I was more worried about the "whatever" part. Looking at typical IPv6 over Foo documents, I would say ND, DAD, PPP, and RFC 3041 issues fit those documents well. But what about the rest? Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
