> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Applicability of draft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00.txt
>
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> There will be many different types of devices, some will
> support downloadable code, some will not. Currently, I don't
> know if the majority will be one sort or another. Some folks
> will want bells & wistles, some won't. I prefer to turn java
> off when I
> browse the net ...
I agree. But my uncle, who was the first person I knew to have a cellphone
doesn't know what java is, much less how to turn it off.
> >
> > Hmmm (again). I guess I'm wondering what is to prevent the
> terminal
> > from having a router in it. 3gpp has agreed to update the spec to
> > assign a prefix, no? What's to keep someone from running routing
> > protocols over the link?
>
> Again, we have never said that this won't happen, there are
> then quite a few additional issues to be tackled. We're
> seperating the two functionalities. For example, I don't
> think a general host requirement document should address
> routing either.
I agree with that. But I was just curious why you thought you couldn't
attach a router on the mobile device end of a GTP pipe?
>
> John
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
