Erik, If the working group solves the applicability definition the problem is in the small.
that would be good. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Applicability of draft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00.txt > > > > I think part of the questions are around the applicability of > the document. > The document doesn't seem to constrain this very much: > > For the purposes of this document, a cellular host is > considered to > be a terminal that uses an air interface to connect to a cellular > access network (i.e. GPRS, UMTS, CDMA2000) in order to > provide IPv6 > connectivity to an IP network. > > So unless "terminal" is a well-defined term in the IETF context this > seems to apply to e.g. a full-powered laptop with a PCMCIA radio card, > a cellular phone with a Java JVM that allows it to run downloaded > applications, and perhaps even a router with such an air interface. > > Erik > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
