I don't agree on the expedite optimism. We have important people in the working group who are not even sure what a GGSN does technically.
PDP Context or 802.11 EAP with AAA will use IPv6. Its like device drivers. They will be custom. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:40 PM > To: Jari Arkko > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Updating draft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00.txt? > > > > >Now, my concern is this: > >how long do you think producing the general document > >to an RFC will take? What should we say in the > >meantime to folks who want to deploy IPv6 now? > >If there are decisions as to what to do with ND/DAD/whatever, > >should those be made by (a) IPv6 WG, (b) 3GPP, or (c) > >vendors? > > This is a valid concern... > > Many of the issues that are raised in your document > could be handled in an "IPv6 over 3GPP PDP Contexts" > document. I think that we should be able to produce > that document fairly quickly, probably quicker than > we will reach consensus on any requirements document, > even your informational one. > > Margaret > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
