> I _do_ think that we need to do an "IPv6 over <name the cellular > link of your choice>" document. This document should include > everything that is really special about building hosts that > talk on cellular links.
I agree. If I remember correctly that was also one of the things that came out of the IPv6-3gpp design team effort. > > One question: Are there enough differences between different > cellular link types that we will need more than one of these > documents? Or is there, effectively, a single type of cellular > link, from an IPv6 perspective? Well, several things are the same: low bandwidth, point-to-point, lossy, needs header compression. I think that was the assumption behind the cellular hosts draft. /Karim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
