Hi Brian, > I don't think there is problem with the content.
Thanks for the clarification - it hasn't always been entirely clear. > I believe > the content needs to be separated. One part to discuss IPv6 > operation over cellular links and one part to discuss the minimal > IPv6 functionality for hosts. The second part really belongs in > a general host requirements document. At the end of the day, this discussion is seeming to point to one fact - we NEED a general host requirements draft. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
