I agree of the potencial benefits of reserving bits in the IID  for future
"useful" use in the future, specialy in the mobility area. In that sense,
i will like any references to EUI-64 based identifiers and the use of u/l
bit being removed from 2473 as being already a proposal for making use of
one "bit".

So my suggestion is option 4:  to reserve u and g bits (call them
something else, pls) and follow the normal IETF standards track process to
decide the (how to) use of them.

I want to stick to the question of Erik but i argue why nodes for example
that want to use a privacy extension (RFC3041) have to indicate that their
IID is not EUI-64 based and hence the use of the privacy extension is
observable.

/aep
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
That you are not paranoid, it doesn't mean that they are not watching you!
http://www.it.kth.se/~aep


> The purpose of *reserving* the bit(s) is to leave the door open
> to assign the bit(s) to something, hopefully useful, in the future.
> But, as pointed out in my original email on the subject, any such proposal
> for *using* the reserved bits for something, would need to go through
> the normal IETF standards track process.
> Reserving the bits just requires the analysis whether the cost of
> carving off the bits is worth the potential benefits of being able to
> use them for something in the future.
>
> Is that more clear?
>
>    Erik
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to