Jim,
     I agree with your assessment.  It is essentially the way I have
integrated IPv6 into an IPv4 system.  One point to keep in mind though
is how to support site-scoped addresses in this model.  The route table
needs expansion in order to incorporate the zone IDs in the lookup.

Regards,
Brian

"Bound, Jim" wrote:
> 
> Its really up to the engineering team for that implementation.  I would integrate v4 
>and v6 and duplicate as little as possible.  At least all data structures so the 
>algorithm for update/replace/delete was the same function module and not duplicated 
>once for tcp and once for udp and yet again for SCTP.  Then there is the emerging 
>RDMA the router might want to use for storage.  Treating all addresses as 16bytes (v4 
>and v6) works and will perform.  Also all the traffic shaping, classification, et al 
>on hardware would make the hardware engineers job a lot easier and thats a 
>performance win too to support both address types.
> 
> regards,
> /jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Murugan KAT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:15 AM
> > To: 'IPng List'
> > Subject: Dual stack routers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Murugan KAT
> > Sent: Tuesday, 19 March 2002 12:07 AM
> > To: 'IPng List'
> > Subject: RE: Requirements for 'O' flag (was Re: IPv6 working group
> > agendafor Minneapolis IETF)
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding Dual Stack Router implementation should a router maintain 2
> > routing tables, one for V4 and other for V6. What about the
> > routing stacks?
> > Should there be 2 instances of a routing protocol (BGP, OSPF etc.,) ?
> >
> > What is the general approach?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > KAT
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to