Kind of tricky for FireWire Brian
"John F. Leser" wrote: > > Just an idea: > > If there is an entire class of problems that can only be solved by a flag > in the address itself, why not reserve the top 16 bits of the Interface > Identifier? To put it another way, if having semantically significant > bits in the address is the best solution for a problem or two now, we > might well want more bits in the future. Also, if we are not going to > support a full 64-bit identifier, 48-bits is the next logical break. > > -John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
