> In which case, I violently agree with Keith. We've already
> overloaded IP addresses with two functions - locator and
> identifier.
I would rather see the WG focus on the value of using a bit to specify whether the address is intended to be both a locator and identifier or just a locator. I personally believe this would be a far better use of real estate than the other proposal. I certainly wouldn't expect any dicision soon on either proposed use, though.
