>We have to do better. I would say that the case for Route
>Optimization is at least as strong as for IPsec and for
>stateless address autoconfiguration, if not as strong as
>the case for TCP. And, none of these four examples
>fit within the guidelines that are suggested by Hesham.
please be aware of already-deployed IPv6 codebase. WinXP is shipping,
MacOS X will be shipping soon, and mobile-ip6 is not yet an RFC.
even home address option (which is a MUST) is changing.
i don't think it a good situation for implementers.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------