On Thu, 30 May 2002, Vijay Devarapalli wrote: > Keiichi SHIMA / 島慶一 wrote: > > > >From an implementor's point of view, manating RO will pose noticeable > > extra work to all IPv6 implementors. It is not so easy to implement > > RO (which means implementing the RR procedure and BCE management). > > from another implementor's point of view, this is nonsense. a lot > of emphasis has been placed on the current MIPv6 internet draft to > minimise the work the CN has to do. I can get you some code, if you > think it is so difficult to implement.
Please show. Is it 50 lines, 100? -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
