At Fri, 31 May 2002 19:54:03 +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > > then we will have two separate set of IPv6 nodes - without mobile-ipv6 > and with mobile-ipv6, and they cannot even ping each other. > do you feel it acceptable?
I'll leave the specific issue (whether MIPv6 should be a MUST) to those who have been tracking this more closely than I have, but addressing the more general question that's lurking here: yes, this sort of thing will happen, and it will be bad, and we will have to deploy updates, and we will move on. We've done it before (eg: IPv4 CIDR, or, if you want to go further back, IPv4 subnets and before that IPv4 address classes other than class A). It's annoying, but the alternative is to wait for all the ducks to be in a row, and those quackers just won't stand still. "The software isn't finished until the last user is dead." -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
