Hello Charles,
> In addition to whatever private mail expressions you may have
received,
> I should point out that it is highly inappropriate for working group
members
>
> in one working group to supply possibly biased information about the
> general state of consensus in another working group. I would say that
> the discussion is far from settled. In fact we are in the middle of
it.
>
No disagreement about where the discussion is, everything is completely
open.
Also, you are correct in that it is up to the WG chairs to judge whether
WG concensus has been met or not. Folks should check with the MIP group
chairs for the status there.
Now, about implementation. Are you aware of any implementations for the
new security algorithm? If there are any, what is the state of their
interoperability?
jak
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
