On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 01:21 AM, Michel Py wrote:
>> Alain Durand wrote:
>> I still do not understand why this draft does not simply advocate
>> using 2 /128.
>
> There is something that makes me scream at the thought of not having
> both ends in the same subnet and/or not having a route for that subnet.
> Possibly some frame-relay flashback? Anyway, this sounds to me as bad as
> using unnumbered. B.A.D.
This sounds like F.U.D. to me. Why do you think it is B.A.D.?
- Alain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
