On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Michel Py wrote: > There is something that makes me scream at the thought of not having > both ends in the same subnet and/or not having a route for that subnet. > Possibly some frame-relay flashback? Anyway, this sounds to me as bad as > using unnumbered. B.A.D.
Why? Using unnumbered on point to point links works quite well. The only place where I've found a numbered link to be more useful on a point to point link is when BGP peering needs to be established across the link and the numbered link will prevent the need to create a static route to the remote neighbor address. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
