On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > >Why? Using unnumbered on point to point links works quite well. The only > >place where I've found a numbered link to be more useful on a point to > >point link is when BGP peering needs to be established across the link and > >the numbered link will prevent the need to create a static route to the > >remote neighbor address. > > checking - "unnumbered" meaning "link-local address only", am I > correct? yes, p2p link without global address works just fine.
No, I meant unnumbered which has no requirement on the scope. In either case though you're correct in that a point to point link doesn't really need a global address in many cases. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
