Robert Elz writes:
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Michael Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> | But the real problem was renumbering. That
> | still hasn't gone away.
>
> No, and that's why we need these things - so when renumbering happens,
> our internal addresses (the ones I use to mount my filesystems from
> the fileserver, etc, which stay in use for months or years between
> reboots) don't alter.
I guess I get off the merry-go-round here because
I'm having a hard time imagining a deployment where
it's OK to hose general internet connectivity, so
long as other local services are kept up. Somehow
I don't expect that the user population counting on
their pr0n will be mollifed to find out that they
can still download their PHB's powerpoints.
YMMV.
Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
