okay, I now understand your use case for SLs, though I still think it would probably be better to solve that problem by assigning a unique, non-publically-routable prefix to each site that asks for one.
> I disagree - but this seems to largely come down to the theory of when > and how SL's will get used. Certainly external renumbering has the > potential to disrupt internal stuff - anything that is using a global > address will be affected. But if I know that I want to guard against > that possibility (as an app writer of the kind of apps that suffer > most - filesystem, mounts, tunnels, ... probably remote logins) then > if I get to use SLs I can avoid the problems for me - one less issue for > the net people to have to deal with. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
