> This language is a compromise to a controversial issue, so if we're all > unhappy with the outcome then it's good. :-)
sorry, that doesn't follow. and it's not true. why in the world do you keep insisting that IETF endorse an implementor's decision to break applications? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
