% Thus, my read of your comment is that your real disagreement is with
% the overall /64 boundary and that you would like us to revisit a
% number of basic decisions with the ultimate goal of giving end sites
% not a /48 or /64, but something much longer.
%
% Or am I misreading your words?
I am in favor of delegating -only- the space needed.
I am more concerned with a hard boundary being set,
perpetuating the fiction that the address identifies
the node, not where it is in the topology. Mixing
these two properties has been a problem for some time.
IPv6 was a chance to divorce the two. I am afraid that
this is a lost opportunity.
% Thomas
--bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
