Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:31:08 -0400
From: Margaret Wasserman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The current situation with the addressing architecture is that we have
| established a consensus of the WG to make two changes to the document
| (described in Bob's mail) and send it (back) to the IESG for consideration
| as a draft standard.
>From where did we get that consensus? We're still discussing the
two changes, it is clear that Tony Hain at least (maybe Jim Bound, that's
less clear) is opposed to one of them. But in general most seem to
support making those changes.
Though that's mostly by silence - and if you believe one of Thomas'
recent messages, silence is not enough to change the status quo ...
(which here would be what is in addrarch-08).
I don't, I think if there's support, and no stated technical objections,
then changes should be made, if the silent majority see that coming and
disagree, they won't remain silent.
| I have not seen a level of response to this thread that would lead me to
| question that consensus. Have you?
I haven't seen anything in this thread that establishes any consensus for
sending the doc back to the IESG yet at all.
kre
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
