Here is what I propose so we don't bore this WG to death: In Atlanta, both kre and I get a 5-minute slot to present.
Then we ask the following question to the floor: "Let's imagine that the 'u' bit does not exist. Do we remove the parts that mandate an address to be /64, or don't we". If the floor says that we toss the /64 boundary, my vote goes to suppress the 'u' bit so this can happen. If the floor says that we keep the /64 boundary, then my vote goes to keep the 'u' bit for the time being, as it does not harm anybody. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
