>And there's the counter evidence that it isn't implemented, and 2026 which >says "not implemented == remove". What makes you say that this isn't implemented? I am very familiar with two implementations that generate IIDs from EUI-64 identifiers and set the 'u' bit accordingly, and I am sure that most other implementations do this as well. That's the only think that the addressing architecture specifies that you can/should do with the 'u' bit... Margaret -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-04.txt Michel Py
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-0... Bill Manning
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-0... Robert Elz
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixl... Thomas Narten
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-pre... Robert Elz
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127... Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-pre... Robert Elz
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixl... Shannon -jj Behrens
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-0... Robert Elz
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixl... Jim Fleming
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-0... Robert Elz
- RE: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-0... Michel Py
- RE: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-0... Michel Py
- Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixl... Markku Savela
- "toss the /64 boundary from the addr... Jim Fleming
